Legal Opinion

Sklar v. Hayes

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1941No. Nos. 787, 788PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

These cases are before the court at this time on motions of the third-party defendant to strike supplemental complaints filed against him in both cases.

The case in which Morris and Zelda Sklar are plaintiffs was originally instituted in this court. The other case, in which Albert and Minnie Singer are plaintiffs was originally instituted in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, and was removed here on the basis of diversity of citizenship between the plaintiffs and defendants.

Both suits arose out of the same accident, which occurred in New Jersey…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  2. Sklar v. HayesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kenrose Mfg. Co., Inc., a New York Corporation v. Fred Whitaker Company, Inc. v. Kilodyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  2. Straub v. Desa Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Delano v. IvesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
  5. Thompson v. CranstonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API