Legal Opinion
Norman Rudisill v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2013No. 12-3486PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
After receiving workers’ compensation benefits for serious injuries sustained while working at Ford Motor Company’s Cleveland Casting Plant (the Plant) in Brook Park, Ohio, Norman Rudisill sued Ford for committing an intentional tort against him. His wife, Karen Rudisill, asserted a derivative claim of loss of consortium in the same complaint. The district court granted summary judgment for Ford, holding that Rudisill had not presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Ford deliberately intended to injure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hoyle v. DTJ Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Williams v. ALPLA, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Miller v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- WELLS v. OKLAHOMA ROOFING & SHEET METALSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Thompson v. Oberlander's Tree & Landscape Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.