Legal Opinion

Hepp v. Pierce

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1984No. 3-1282A350PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Judge.

These three cases have been consolidated because each presents the same question based upon substantially identical facts. The issue concerns the propriety of sanctions imposed upon counsel for all three appellants, Zarko Sekerez. The third case, Linda Harris v. Benjamin F. Grant, M.D., presents an additional issue concerning the propriety of summary judgment entered against the plaintiff.

All three appeals began as medical malpractice actions. In each a proposed complaint was filed with the Commissioner of Insurance pursuant to the Medical Malpractice Act, IC 16-9.5-1-1 et seq.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Toth v. LenkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Jolly v. MODISETTIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Clark County State Bank v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Watson v. ThibodeauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Kerr v. CarlosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Merritt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Martin v. RinckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API