Bronner Brick Co. v. M. M. Canda Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion for a new trial on the justice’s minutes. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion. '
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $300, with interest from the 15th day of Rovember, 1895, for merchandise, consisting of brick, sold and delivered on or about the last-mentioned date. The sum of $150 was paid on account previous to the commencement of the action, and thereafter and before the defendant’s time to answer had expired, there was paid, under circumstances hereafter detailed, the further sum of $150. The defendant then served an answer, alleging “ that it has paid, satisfied and discharged in full the claim of the plaintiff herein as' set forth in the complaint and all…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cutter v. . the Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Executors of HodgmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hamilton v. . Van RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Fake v. Addy'sCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davison v. KlaessNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Obert v. ZahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bank of United States v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Himberg v. RogersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
- Weeks v. StarrAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911