Obert v. Zahn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from, District Court, Caddo County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by Abe Zahn against M. Obert. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings- error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
After the mandate had gone do-wn and been spread of record -in the district court of Caddo- county, Zahn v. Obert, 24 Okla. 159, 103 Pac. 102, an action of unlawful detainer came on for trial upon the merits. During the trial it developed, pending the cause and -after issues joined, that Obert had left the country -and yielded possession of the property in controversy to Zahn without any agreement as to- costs. Thereupon it was contended by counsel for defendant that the court had lost jurisdiction of the subject-matter, and was without power ■to render judgment in favor of plaintiff for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shed v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Ayer v. AshmeadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Sweetland v. TuthillIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hampton v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Yeargain v. SutterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- American Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State ex rel. Linde v. Equity Co-operative ExchangeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.