Ateeq v. Najor
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, Acting P. J.
Elia Najor appeals a judgment in favor of George Ateeq after the jury returned a special verdict in Ateeq’s favor and the court subsequently denied Najor’s motion for judgment based on a statute of limitations defense. Najor asserts the court erred in finding he was estopped from pleading the statute of limitations defense because of the duress he imposed on Ateeq through wrongful threats of deportation. Najor also asserts the court erred in finding he waived his objections to certain evidence offered by Ateeq for failure to state any objections to such evidence in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zephier v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- One Star v. Sisters of St. FrancisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Ra Medical Systems, Inc. v. Photomedex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Dees v. California State University, HaywardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Lucero v. County of Kern CA5California Court of Appeal · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.