Legal Opinion

Buresh v. City of Las Cruces

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1969No. 8844PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEE C. BLYTHE, District Judge.

This case turns on questions of limitations of action, and we hold that the three-year limitation of § 23-1-23, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp., must be applied to an “inverse condemnation” action against a municipality and to a purported written promise to pay growing out of the same matter.

This action was commenced in the District Court of Dona Ana County, New Mexico. Plaintiffs-appellants sought compensation for real property allegedly taken by defendant-appellee, without any legal proceeding and without any compensation having been paid therefor. The trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Summerford v. Board of Com'rs.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Alvarez v. Board of Trustees of La Union TownsiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stokes v. New Mexico State Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Jinkins v. City of JalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dairyland Insurance v. RoseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Saiz Ex Rel. Waite v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Galvan v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. McClure v. Town of MesillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hill v. State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API