Legal Opinion

Jinkins v. City of Jal

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1963No. 7268PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This is an appeal from the action of the trial court, refusing to enjoin the city of Jal from violating a restriction in a deed and refusing to enjoin the continued operation of a disposal plant in violation of the restriction.

The appeal raises two questions, (1) whether one who violates a restrictive covenant as to the use of land may be enjoined without proof of damages, in a case where the court finds that the violation was not a nuisance, and (2) whether an action to enforce a restrictive covenant is barred by any statute of limitations, or only because of the passage of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bristol v. WoodwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. McLaughlin v. NeigerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Timberon Protective AssociationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Buresh v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dice v. Central Natrona County Improvement & Service DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Polaco v. PrudencioNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API