Legal Opinion
Luxottica Group S.P.A. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2001No. 00 Civ. 1513(WHP), 00 Civ. 2546(WHP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
This breach of contract and trademark action arises out of the sale of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated’s (“B & L”) sunglass business to Luxottica Group S.p.A. (“Luxottica”) in June 1999. In connection with that sale, the parties entered into a trademark license agreement, which permitted Luxottica to use certain B & L trademarks on sunglasses and related goods for a prescribed period. B & L claims that Luxot-tica breached that agreement and seeks a preliminary injunction enjoining Luxottica from using B & L’s trademarks, from representing to the public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Genesee Brewing Company, Inc., D/B/A Highfalls Brewing Company v. Stroh Brewing Company, D/B/A Northern Plains Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. And Yellowbill Finance Limited v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Otokoyama Co. v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. Chu Cho LamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S&L VITAMINS, INC. v. Australian Gold, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- TV Tokyo Corp. v. 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (In re 4Kids Entertainment, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Hyperlogistics Group, Inc. v. Kraton Polymers U.S. LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006