Rayfield v. Park
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in case for personal injuries. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max Eberhardt, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment rendered in a suit by Stella Bayfield, a minor, by her next friend, against Sans Souci Park, a corporation, and the Marshall Amusement Company, also a corporation. The case is one of the fourth class, in which no formal pleadings are required, but, in lieu of a declaration, the plaintiff, in case the suit is for a tort, is required by section 40 of the “Act in relation to a Municipal Court in the city of Chicago”, to file “a brief statement of the nature of the tort, and such ' further…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gridley v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. BarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- City of Peoria v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
- Chicago & G. T. Ry. Co. v. HoffmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goettee v. CarlyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Blue Grass Fair Ass'n v. BunnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Howard v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Babicz v. Riverview Sharpshooters Park Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911