Ellis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted under article 636 of the Penal Code, which reads: “All male persons who habitually associate with prostitutes, or habitually loiter in and around houses-of prostitution, or who, without having visible means of support, receive financial aid or assistance from prostitutes,” is a vagrant. The information in this case charges that appellant “did habitually associate with a prostitute, to wit: Bertha Pearson, the said Bertha Pearson then and there being a prostitute.” In no part of the complaint is appellant said to be a "male person,” nor is any allegation…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. FuskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Lingenfelter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Benson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.