Legal Opinion

Lingenfelter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1914No. 2883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The information and complaint contain several counts; the following, however, was submitted-: “The said William Lingenfelter was then and there a male person who habitually associates with prostitutes and who hábitually loiters in and around houses of prostitution, against the peace and dignity of the State.”

The facts show that appellant was a barber and worked at the Saint Charles barbershop and received sixty per cent of the money he took in for his wages. The State’s case is shown, substantially, by the following evidence: Minnie Lee Jones said she lived at Miss Bell…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Michael Anthony Robinson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991
  5. Stephen Joseph Boswell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API