Legal Opinion
Raymond v. Rowland
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 12, 2004No. 3:03 CV 0118(MRK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs claim that Defendants have failed reasonably to accommodate disabled individuals who require or seek essential services from the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701, et seq., and federal and state law. Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Class Certification [doc. # 24]. Because the Plaintiffs meet the requirements for class certification set out in Rule 23 of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Veronica Caridad, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brooklyn Center for Independence of Disabled v. BloombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Cashman v. Dolce International/Hartford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Lovely H. v. EgglestonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled v. BloombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re PE Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.