Legal Opinion
Lovely H. v. Eggleston
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 2006No. 05 Civ. 6920(LTS)(AJP)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWAIN, District Judge.
In this action Plaintiffs, who assert that they are welfare recipients with disabilities who reside in New York City, seek declaratory and injunctive relief under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1974 (“the Rehabilitation Act”), the Due Process Clauses of the United States and New York State Constitutions, and various New York State and City civil rights and social services statutes and regulations, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of New York City welfare recipients with…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baron v. Advanced Asset & Property Management Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Ragusa v. Malverne Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Levine v. Smithtown Central School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Vinokur v. Sovereign BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- C.H., by her guardians J.G. and C.K. v. HochulDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.