Legal Opinion

Benante v. United Pacific Life Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1994No. 37A03-9307-CV-00236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Margie Benante prevailed upon her conversion claim against Joseph Kobielak and United Pacific Life Insurance Company ("UPL"); the judgment was modified upon motion to correct error. Benante appeals and seeks additur; UPL cross-appeals and seeks reversal or remittitur. Seven issues are presented for this court's review. One issue is dispositive: whether UPL was entitled to judgment on the evidence because there is an absence of evidence that Kobielak acted as the agent of UPL when he converted funds belonging to Benante.

We reverse.

The facts underlying this appeal are…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stockberger v. Meridian Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Dahlin v. Amoco Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Sipes v. OSMOSE WOOD PRESERVING CO. OF AM., INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Crawfordsville v. MichaelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Aetna Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. RodriguezIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Highland v. ZerkelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Benante v. United Pacific Life Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Benante v. United Pacific Life Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Town of Highland v. ZerkelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API