Schwartz v. Warwick-Philadelphia Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Mr. Justice Musmanno,
It was a wedding banquet and the guests were enjoying themselves in the traditional custom of nuptial celebrations. There was dining and dancing and then dancing and dining. Fork work interspersed with footwork. The banquetters would enjoy a spell of eating and then amble out to the dance floor to dance. When the music suspended, the dancers returned to their tables and became diners again. The mythical playwright who prepares the script for the strange and sometimes quixotic episodes which eventually end up in court, mixed his stage properties and characters in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Liguori v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Branch v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Kelly Et Ux. v. YountSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Clark v. Glosser Bros. Department Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McMillan v. Mountain Laurel Racing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Masciangelo v. DOLENTESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Baier v. Universal Welding, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1971
- Manufacturers Mutual Fire Insurance v. G. R. Kinney Co. Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- McMillan v. Mountain Laurel Racing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.