Legal Opinion

Harmon Metz Waley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1956No. 14872_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate sentence made under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Waley, who entered a plea of guilty to violating the federal kidnaping statute in 1935, 1 contends that his plea was entered without an understanding of the charge and that he was entitled to a trial by jury.

Waley first argues that the attorney who, the record indicates, was assigned by the trial court to counsel him at the time of his plea of guilty was in fact assigned only to counsel his wife, a co-defendant. He raises the contention that the record is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spillers v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nelson Gene Johnston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  4. Warren David Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. G.E.G. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API