Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Drayton

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1996No. 93-0348; CMR No. 9201149Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

The majority characterizes the coercion of a company commander (a captain) by a battalion commander (a lieutenant colonel) in the pre-referral process as a “defect.” 45 MJ at 182. I call it unlawful command influence. Article 37(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 837(a), on its face prohibits coercion by a superior officer of subordinate commanders in their military justice functions. It states in part: “No person subject to this chapter may attempt to coerce or, by an unauthorized means, influence the action of a court-martial or any other military tribunal or any member thereof,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. StombaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. HawthorneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API