Legal Opinion

Burger v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1931No. 29,626PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This action is one to recover damages to vacant city property caused by widening a drainage ditch and depositing the earth taken therefrom on the street in front of the property owned by the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants and each of them. They appeal.

The court made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

“I am finding for the plaintiff and against both defendants in this case in the sum of $500; $50 for damage for damming up water and causing it- to stand upon the lots,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Olathe, Lawrence & Topeka Railway Co. v. WeidenmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Kansas City & Southwestern Railroad v. EhretSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Kansas City & Southwestern Railroad v. BairdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Kansas City & Southwestern Railroad v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Ottawa, Osage City & Council Grove Railroad v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liddick v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Hickey v. GriggsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mai v. City of Garden CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Board of Park Commissioners v. FitchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API