Rogers v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
The issue in this case involving the interpretation of the Omnibus DWI Act is when does a prior “offense” occur for purposes of penalty enhancement. A stipulation of facts between the appellant and the State shows that on May 11, 1986, the appellant operated his vehicle while intoxicated in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 75-2503(a) (Supp. 1985). He had two prior convictions, one conviction on June 22, 1984, and the other on July 17,1985. The stipulation does not include the dates on which the prior offenses were committed. The trial court found the appellant guilty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- State v. MidellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Hardison v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Tims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Colburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.