State v. Midell
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
Five issues are presented for determination on this appeal.
1. Did the interval between the date of the alleged offense and the date of arrest deprive the defendant of due process of law ?
2. Did the trial court err in not requiring a witness to disclose the identity of an informer ?
*5203. Were the facts as alleged in the complaint sufficient to permit a finding of probable cause for the issuance of a warrant of arrest ?
4. Did the unavailability of the original complaint at the time of trial constitute sufficient grounds for dismissal?
5. Did the trial court err in sentencing the defendant as a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Pillsbury v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WittrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BanksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Melby v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. NeesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.