Legal Opinion

Fear v. Horner Sales Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 7988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

This is a qui tarn action brought to recover penalties imposed by Section 4901, Revised Statutes, 35 U.S.C.A. § 50, for marking goods covered by patent of the De-Raef Corporation as licensed under its patent without in fact having a license, in violation of the section. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the complaint presented no genuine issue of fact and a motion that the complaint be dismissed on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendant further requested that costs be taxed against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Central R. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Newgold v. American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  3. Winner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
  4. French v. FoleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
  5. Fish v. ManningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Felt ex rel. United States v. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1952
  2. De-Raef Corp. v. Horner Sales Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API