Fish v. Manning
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action is brought to recover $100,000 penalties for the alleged offense of stamping certain patented articles made .by the defendants without the patentee’s consent, under section 4901 of the United States Revised Statutes. A demurrer to the complaint has been interposed on various grounds.
This offense is not made criminal by statute, although penal; and it is therefore to be distinguished, in some important respects, from the case cited of Boyd v. U. S., 116 U. S. 634, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 524. The sufficiency of the complaint is to be determined according to the rules applicable to civil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Ferrett v. AtwillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1846
- Gilmore v. MathewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
- State v. Con O'KeefeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
- Platt v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greenberg v. Union Nat'l BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Fear v. Horner Sales Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Kirby v. Western Union Telegraph Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894