Newgold v. American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
At Law. On motion to compel defendant to produce books and papers.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
In the above qui tarn action, which is brought under section 4901 of the United States Revised Statutes for the recovery of $40,000 for the alleged false marking of 400 articles as patented, a motion is made that the defendant be compelled to produce its books and papers before trial for examination by the plaintiff, for the purpose of showing the number of penalties alleged to have been incurred..
The right to the production or discovery of these papers is based upon section 724 of the United States Revised Statutes, which provides as follows:
“Sec. 724. In the trial of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Filmon Process Corporation v. Spell-Right CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Calderwood v. MansfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Zuckerman v. PilotDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- E. H. Rohde Leather Co. v. Duncan & Sons, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Sippit Cups, Inc. v. Michael's Creations, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.