Legal Opinion

Santanna Natural Gas Corp. and Women's Natural Gas Corp. v. Hamon Operating Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 20, 1997No. 03-97-00104-CVPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDD, Justice.

This case is yet another attempt to resolve by summary judgment a case too complex to reduce all material factual disputes to questions of law. Appellants Santanna Natural Gas Corporation and Women’s Natural Gas Corporation (collectively “SNG”) sued Ha-mon Operating Company (“Hamon”), Texaco Inc. (“Texaco”), Servco Gas Marketing, Inc., and its successor in interest, Vaquero Gas Company (collectively “Serveo”) for conversion, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment. After settlement was reached with all defendants except Hamon, the district court granted Hamon’s fourth…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Vela v. Marywood, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Everett v. TK-Taito, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Access Mediquip L.L.C. v. Unitedhealthcare InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Taub v. Houston Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. At & T CORP. v. Rylander, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API