Legal Opinion

Consumers Twine & Machinery Co. v. Mount Pleasant Thermo Tank Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 22, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

I. The Consumers Twine & Machinery Company, appellant, and the Mt. Pleasant Thermo Tank Company, appellee, are Iowa corporations. The former, located at Sioux City, was, at all times material to the present controversy, engaged in the business of manufacturing binders’ twine and ropes and selling farm supplies. The latter was organized in 1919, for the purpose of purchasing and acquiring by assignment letters patent, particularly of the watering tanks and troughs hereafter described. The patents in question, which were originally issued to Hilmer N. Bnholm, were acquired in 1919, by…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Lee v. PercivalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Stevenson v. PolkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Jump v. SparlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Liebscher v. KrausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fink v. Montgomery Elevator Company of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  2. New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Kennedy & Parsons Co. v. Lander Dairy & Produce Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hellawell v. Garrett Busch & Son, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. G. E. Conkey Co. v. BochmannDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API