Legal Opinion

Hellawell v. Garrett Busch & Son, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Alonzo G.), J.

The plaintiff, receiver of the First National Bank of Hempstead, seeks to recover from Bertha Busch, individually, and as executrix of George P. Busch, deceased, the sum of $4,075 upon a promissory note made and delivered to the bank by defendant Garrett Busch & Son, Inc., and indorsed by Garrett Busch individually, and by the defendant Bertha Busch, as follows: “ George P. Busch Estate by Bertha Busch Executrix.”

The defendant Bertha Busch contests plaintiff’s right to recover against her individually on such indorsement, and asserts by way of affirmative defenses:…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ferrin v. . MyrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. O'Brien v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Chouteau v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Jump v. SparlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hellawell v. Garrett Busch & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. FrankenfelderNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API