Legal Opinion

State v. Purcell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1985No. 20093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice.

Defendant Selmar Purcell appeals from a jury verdict convicting him of theft for stealing furniture from an apartment he rented, a second degree felony. U.C.A., 1953, §§ 76-6-404, -412(l)(a) (1978 ed.). Purcell alleges that photographs of the stolen furniture were erroneously admitted into evidence without adequate foundation and that the evidence was insufficient to establish either that the furniture was worth more than $1,000, or that he exercised control over it. We affirm the jury’s conviction.

On January 28, 1983, Purcell rented a furnished apartment located in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PetreeUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BallenbergerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AlzagaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Shiozawa v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. State v. BloomfieldCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. State v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API