State v. Harris
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from a conviction for fraudulently using a credit card. 1 Reversed.
The accused knowingly was particeps to a 1970 purchase by his lady companion,— of a suit that not only happened to fit him but also his purpose. The haberdasher was the only one who testified as to the value of the vestment, — $70 wholesale, $140 retail. The penalty was fixed and such penalty was less for the offense if the value of the property was less that $100, and greater if it was in excess thereof.
Defendant asked that the jury be instructed of the difference, which was denied, to which exception…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KimbelUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LimbUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BallenbergerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. PurcellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005