Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1974No. 12998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a conviction for fraudulently using a credit card. 1 Reversed.

The accused knowingly was particeps to a 1970 purchase by his lady companion,— of a suit that not only happened to fit him but also his purpose. The haberdasher was the only one who testified as to the value of the vestment, — $70 wholesale, $140 retail. The penalty was fixed and such penalty was less for the offense if the value of the property was less that $100, and greater if it was in excess thereof.

Defendant asked that the jury be instructed of the difference, which was denied, to which exception…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KimbelUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LimbUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. BallenbergerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. PurcellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API