Legal Opinion

Connecticut v. Menillo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 11, 1975No. 74-1569PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1971 a jury convicted Patrick Menillo of attempting to procure an abortion in violation of Connecticut’s criminal abortion statute. Menillo is not a physician and has never had any medical training. The Connecticut Supreme Court nevertheless overturned Menillo’s conviction, holding that under the decisions in Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113 (1973), and Doe v. Bolton, 410 U. S. 179 (1973), the Connecticut statute was “null and void.” As we think the Connecticut court misinterpreted Roe and Doe, we grant the State’s petition for certiorari and vacate the judgment.

The statute under which Menillo…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. BrickerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Cheaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cheaney v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. H. L. v. MathesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Richard M. Ragsdale v. Bernard J. Turnock, Director of the Illinois Department of Public HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Jennie McCormack v. Mark HiedemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API