Legal Opinion

State v. Carney, 06 Be 18 (6-21-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2007No. 06 BE 18PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant James Carney appeals from his sentence entered in the Belmont County Common Pleas Court. Four issues are raised in this appeal. The first issue is whether Carney was sentenced to more than the maximum sentence. The second issue is whether his plea was entered into knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. The third issue is whether the state breached the terms of the plea agreement. The fourth issue concerns whether trial counsel was ineffective. For the reasons expressed below, the guilty plea was not entered in compliance with Crim.R. 11(C), thus, the April…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Bailey, 2006-G-2734 (11-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API