In re the Marriage of Valente
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.
¶1 A trial court has broad discretion to award maintenance to address the medical needs of a spouse, but reserving jurisdiction to revisit maintenance if the disease worsens is problematic. When the trial court finds only that a spouse “may” incur future medical ex*820penses and rehabilitation costs, it is an abuse of discretion to make a “placeholder” award of nominal maintenance in order to reserve jurisdiction.
¶2 Here, the trial court awarded Fukiko Valente (Nao) nominal maintenance of $100 per month from the time she turns 72 years old until the death of either party or her remarriage. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re the Marriage of KhanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In Re The Marriage Of: Joseph C. Anthony v. Penny L. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re Marriage of WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 2024
- Ben M. Thielhorn v. Cheryl ThielhornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Christopher James Burrows v. Alicia Ann De GonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.