Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Valente

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 10, 2014No. 69242-9-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.

¶1 A trial court has broad discretion to award maintenance to address the medical needs of a spouse, but reserving jurisdiction to revisit maintenance if the disease worsens is problematic. When the trial court finds only that a spouse “may” incur future medical ex*820penses and rehabilitation costs, it is an abuse of discretion to make a “placeholder” award of nominal maintenance in order to reserve jurisdiction.

¶2 Here, the trial court awarded Fukiko Valente (Nao) nominal maintenance of $100 per month from the time she turns 72 years old until the death of either party or her remarriage. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of KhanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. In Re The Marriage Of: Joseph C. Anthony v. Penny L. AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. In re Marriage of WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Ben M. Thielhorn v. Cheryl ThielhornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. Christopher James Burrows v. Alicia Ann De GonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API