In re the Marriage of Khan
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.
¶1 Nishat Khan appeals the trial court’s spousal maintenance order, claiming the court erred by limiting the duration of the awarded maintenance. Nishat’s former husband, Azad Khan,1 is obligated to support her pursuant to an affidavit of support he signed under federal immigration law as the sponsor of her application for permanent legal residency. Nishat argues that the trial court erred in not enforcing this obligation through the maintenance award. We hold that Nishat’s right to support under federal immigration law is a contract right separate from any rights she had as a result of her…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liu v. KellDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Kumar v. Kumar (In re Kumar), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Ben M. Thielhorn v. Cheryl ThielhornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- John Mason, V Tatyana MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Randy Kris Ramgoolam v. Ritu GuptaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.