Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahon

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

This court is without power, by summary order, to direct the Prohibition Administrator to return to the petitioners the half-barrels of beer of which he has possession. In addition to the cases cited in my memorandum of May 21, 1930, in the Gerberti and Caliguiri Case (D. C.) 42 F.(2d) 570, see In re Chin K. Shue (D. C.) 199 F. 282, 285; United States v. Hee (D. C.) 219 F. 1019; United States v. Maresea (D. C.) 266 F. 713, 717, 718; Weinstein v. Attorney General (C. C. A.) 271 F. 673.

The question is not as to the meaning or scope of section 26 of title 2 of the National…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  3. United States v. HeeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
  4. Weinstein v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. In re Chin K. ShueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Goodman v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. ChicelliDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  4. United States v. FarringtonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. In re LefkowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API