Legal Opinion

Torres v. Lacey

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

The defendant, Lacey, as the president of a voluntary unincorporated association, moves pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment upon the ground that the complaint or the second cause of action fails to state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action, or alternatively, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for dismissal of the complaint or the second cause of action upon the same ground.

Plaintiff alleges a first cause of action in assault and battery against John Doe, an unknown assailant. This defendant has defaulted in appearance. The second…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Lubliner v. ReinlibNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Miller v. . BloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gregory Oskoian, Etc. v. Theobald J. Canuel, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  2. Torres v. LaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith v. Arab Anti-Defamation LeagueNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Grahame v. Rochester Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Kirby v. DubinskyNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API