Legal Opinion

Torres v. Lacey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying the motion to dismiss the complaint or the second cause of action for insufficiency, unanimously modified by dismissing the second cause of action, without costs to either party, with leave to replead. Martin v. Curran (303 N. Y. 276) is not applicable to an. unincorporated association’s unintentional tort, such as is involved in this second cause of action. Special Term correctly ruled that to require membership authorization or even ratification of such an unintentional tort is, in effect, to attempt to transmute a negligent act into a willful wrong. This is an inadmissible…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Torres v. LaceyNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Piniewski v. PanepintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Walsh v. Torres-LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith v. Arab Anti-Defamation LeagueNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Drabinsky v. Actors' Equity AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  5. Grahame v. Rochester Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API