Legal Opinion

United States v. Freeman

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 29, 1974No. IP 73-CR-206PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ENTRY

NOLAND, District Judge.

Defendant is charged in a four count indictment with devising a scheme and artifice intended to defraud the Indiana Bell Telephone Company by the use of a “blue box” to place long distance telephone calls. The “blue box” is a mechanical device which may be placed on the caller’s telephone line so as to utilize the box’s electronics components to bypass or avoid the recording mechanisms of the company and, thus, make long distance telephone calls without paying for them. This, the indictment alleges, constitutes fraud by wire in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Rocco Dote and Theodore P. Veesart, United States of America v. Nick Guglielmo and Joseph B. Delmonico, A/K/A Joey D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. Herman D. Brandon v. United States of America, Sylvester E. Gautreaux, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. BeckleyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1965
  4. United States v. DeLeeuwDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
  5. United States v. JaworskiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael William CleggCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. James A. Harvey, A/K/A Ray Stewart, A/K/A Joseph R. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Melvin L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. PemberthyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API