Legal Opinion

State v. Pemberthy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 5, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

224 N.J. Super. 280 (1988)

540 A.2d 227

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

GABRIEL PEMBERTHY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RIGOBERTO MONCADA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 22, 1988.

Decided April 5, 1988.

Before Judges PETRELLA, DREIER and BAIME.

Louis N. Rainone argued the cause for appellant Gabriel Pemberthy (A-767-84T4) (Karcher, McDonnell & Rainone, attorneys; Louis N. Rainone, of counsel and on the brief).

Philip A. Ross, Designated Attorney, argued the cause for appellant Rigoberto Moncada…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pemberthy v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. BurrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. State v. Hector Feliciano(074395)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  4. State v. StelznerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  5. State v. ChaneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API