Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Manuel Candelario

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 15, 2001No. 99-11443PublishedCited by 158 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

The issue we must resolve on rehearing 1 is whether Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), requires the vacation of appellant’s sentences and a remand for re-sentencing. Applying the plain error standard of review, we affirm.

I

From 1992 to mid-1993, defendant Jose Manuel Candelario was a partner in a conspiracy to sell cocaine with Theodore Cochran, Jr. Cochran and Candelario obtained powder cocaine from Miami and other locations and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Sean Lamar Sanders, A/K/A Sean Lamont SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API