Legal Opinion

Britvar v. Schainuck

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1989No. 88CA0241PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Plaintiff, Amy Britvar, d/b/a Amy Brit-var Real Estate and Management Co., appeals the judgment that denied her claim for compensation from defendant, Louis I. Shainuck, for management and leasing services rendered, and refused to grant prejudgment interest on her award of out-of-pocket expenses. We affirm.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in not awarding her compensation for services rendered based on quantum meruit, unjust enrichment, or quasi-contract. We disagree.

A quasi-contract is a fictional contract created by equitable construction to enforce duties by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Cole v. HotzColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Menocal v. GEO Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. Iowa Waste Systems, Inc. v. Buchanan CountyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2000
  4. University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American CyanamidDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  5. Scott's Liquid Gold-Inc. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API