Scott's Liquid Gold-Inc. v. Lexington Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
In this diversity breach of contract action, Plaintiff Scott’s Liquid Gold (Scott’s) seeks indemnification from Defendant Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington) for claims brought against Scott’s in previous litigation by the United States Army and the South Adams County Water and Sanitation District (SACWSD) concerning groundwater contamination at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. After consideration of the stipulated facts, evidence, trial briefs, and applicable law, I enter the following findings of facts and conclusions of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Westfield Development Co. v. Rifle Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & CompaniesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Hopeman Bros., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- In the Interest of Delluomo v. CedarbladeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Great West Casualty Co. v. SeeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.