Legal Opinion
Margulis v. Lindsay
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
The issue in this case turns on the breadth of meaning of the term “ project ” in the Public Housing Law. Appellants attribute to the term “ project ’’ a particular meaning which would require resubmission for approval to the New York City Board of Estimate of a project modified since the prior approval by the board. Respondents, on the other hand, would give the term a broader and, therefore, a vaguer rendering, thus making unnecessary a reapproval because of modifications. While the issue in litigation is phrased in technical terms and embraces the arts of statutory interpretation, the *171issue…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Starburst Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Trinity Episcopal School Corporation v. RomneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Orth-O-Vision, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- MATTER OF LOWER E. SIDE JOINT PLANNING COUNCIL v. New York City Bd. of EstimateNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Lower East Side Joint Planning Council v. New York City Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.