MATTER OF LOWER E. SIDE JOINT PLANNING COUNCIL v. New York City Bd. of Estimate
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Before approving an urban renewal plan for the Seward Park Extension area of New York City, respondent amended the proposal by redesignating 100 out of a much larger number of units of family housing to housing for the elderly. This alteration, in a project containing 1,341 units, is not major and does not alter the essential nature of the project. Consequently, it was within respondent’s power to make the modification (see Margulis v Lindsay, 31 NY2d 167; Fisher v Becker, 32 AD2d 786, affd no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Margulis v. LindsayNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Fisher v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Fisher v. BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Starburst Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Plotnick v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Coalition for Responsible Planning, Inc. v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Under 21 v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1984