Legal Opinion

Santos v. Insurance Placement Facility

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1993No. 2634PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the Insurance Placement Facility of Pennsylvania (Fair Plan.)1 Judgment in favor of the Fair Plan was ordered *228because the lower court concluded that appellants-Santos had not complied with a condition of the fire insurance policy between themselves and Fair Plan. On appeal, Santos argue that the condition, i.e., appraisal of disputed amounts of loss, may not be asserted by Fair Plan because it breached its duty of fair dealing by reason of delay in handling Santos’ claim. We find no error by the lower court and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Hayward v. Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. A & E Supply Company, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, a & E Supply Company, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. American States Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Park Restoration, LLC v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Willisch v. Nationwide Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. GRAMAGLIA-PARENT v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. National Union Fire Insurance v. IREX Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API