Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Velsicol Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1951No. Gen. 45,256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley

This is an action to restrain the directors of Velsieol Corporation from carrying out a plan of recapitalization and to nullify acts already done pursuant to the plan. A master in chancery recommended a decree dismissing the suit for want of equity. The chancellor sustained exceptions to the master’s report and entered a decree in favor of plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

Plaintiff is a research chemist. In 1930 he was employed by the Pure Oil Company. During the latter part of 1930 he spoke to defendant Regenstein, his cousin, about inventions he had made in the petroleum field. He wanted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Orchard v. CovelliDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Romanik v. Lurie Home Supply Center, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Velsicol Corp. v. HymanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API