Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Rudnick
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 13, 1945PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The indictment is in one count charging that, with knowledge of St. 1907, c. 550, §§ 12 and 31, Barnett Welansky, the defendant Rudnick, Reuben 0. Bodenhorn, James Welansky, David Gilbert, and Theodore Eldracher from on or about June 1, 1942, continuously until May 1, 1943, conspired (1) to alter the buildings at 17 Piedmont Street, 4 and 6 Shawmut Street, and 59 and 65 Broadway, Boston, without a permit issued by the building commissioner of the city of Boston, (2) to alter the buildings in such a way that the work to be done was not to be *48done in accordance with drawings bearing the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Frohwerk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. GeaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Commonwealth v. GranitoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Commonwealth v. FioreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Gifford v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.