Legal Opinion

Chesebrough-Pond's Inc. v. Faberge, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1980No. Appeal No. 79-558PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judlge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ■ which granted appellee Faberge’s motion for summary judgment dismissing Chesebrough-Pond’s (hereinafter “Chesebrough”) counterclaim for cancellation of Faberge’s registration of the mark MACHO in opposition No. 57,551. We affirm.

Background

Faberge opposed registration by Chesebrough of the mark MATCH for use on men’s toiletries, based on its use and registration of the mark MACHO for the same goods. Chesebrough counterclaimed for cancellation of Faberge’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dan Robbins & Associates v. Questor Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Knickerbocker Toy Co. v. Faultless Starch Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Toro Co. v. Hardigg Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Palisades Pageants, Inc. v. Miss America PageantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. United States Treasury v. Synthetic Plastics Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jeremiah D. Leach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. CENTRAL MFG. v. Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API