Legal Opinion

Austin v. Freestone County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1926No. 441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

Suit by Freestone county against the First State Bank of Teague, C. O. Austin, as banking commissioner, and the Federal Reserve. Bank of Dallas, as defendants. The object of the suit was to recover certain United States bonds, or foreclose a lien on same, which were alleged to be in the possession of the Federal Reserve Bank, and which the Teague bank and banking commissioner were claiming free from any claim, right, or lien of plaintiff. Trial was had before the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment awarding to appellee, Freestone county, the title and possession of said bonds; hence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gardner v. RundellTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Barfield v. EmeryTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Watson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. McBride v. American Railway & Lighting Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Northwest Lumber Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plaza Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Sullivan v. City of GalvestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Warren v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Watson v. WhittonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API