Canfield v. Wright

Appellee, ’ Wright, who had a judgment against appellant Canfield, sued out a writ of garnishment thereon on May 20, 1924, against E. R. Hart, garnishee. 1-Iart answered, stating, first, that he did not owe Canfield anything, “except as hereinafter specifically set forth.” He then states that Canfield, as a broker, had • sold • some land for him on the 5th day of May, 1924, and that he had become indebted to Canfield in the. sum of $300; that at the request of Canfield he had credited $150 of said amount on an account which he held against Mrs. Clara Dindsey, and had placed the other'$150 in…