Legal Opinion

Farley v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 2, 1953No. 477-52PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, Chief Judge

Plaintiff seeks to recover certain overtime compensation and additional “night pay differential” allegedly due her arising from employment as a correctional officer at the Federal Eeformatory for Women, Alderson, West Virginia. Both parties have moved for summary judgment on the ground that no issue of material fact is presented. We feel that both motions must be denied.

The questions presented entail a construction of The Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, 59 Stat. 295, and, more particularly, a determination of what constitutes “hours of employment” as that term is used in section 201. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Baxter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seliga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  2. Joseph Horne Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API